ENHU vs IWB

ENHU vs IWB

Which is better, ENHU or IWB?

IWB has been ahead.

IWB has a lower expense ratio. IWB led over 1Y. IWB is less concentrated, with 36.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.4%.

Lower Fees: IWBHigher Returns (1Y): IWBLess Concentrated: IWB

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricENHUIWB
Expense Ratio0.22%0.15%Best
AUM$11M$49.5B
Dividend Yield0.75%0.92%
Holdings3531,023
YTD Return+14.20%Best+12.91%
1Y Return+15.86%+16.56%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.96%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.34%
Top 10 Weight37.4%36.0%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 4, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ENHU vs IWB growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ENHU against instead:ENHU vs SPYENHU vs QQQENHU vs VOOENHU vs VTIIWB against:IWB vs VXUS

ENHU vs IWB Performance

iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ENHU returned +15.86% while IWB returned +16.56%. Year to date, ENHU is up 14.20% versus a gain of 12.91% for IWB.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ENHU charges 0.22% per year while IWB charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $15 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENHU currently yields 0.75% against 0.92% for IWB.

Holdings Overlap

ENHU already in IWB94.8%
IWB already in ENHU77.1%

94.8% of ENHU's money is in holdings IWB also owns. 77.1% of IWB's money is in holdings ENHU also owns.

Most of ENHU is already inside IWB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

318 positions in common, counted across the 350 positions we hold weights for in ENHU and 1,024 in IWB, against full books of 353 and 1,023.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 607 positions for IWB that do not appear in our book for ENHU (22.0% of the fund), and 24 for ENHU that do not appear in IWB (4.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ENHUWeight in IWBDifference
NVDANvidia Corp7.37%7.63%0.26%
AAPLApple, Inc7.08%6.77%0.31%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.73%5.40%0.33%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.96%3.41%0.55%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.01%2.79%0.22%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.51%2.26%0.25%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.47%2.26%0.21%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.18%2.26%0.08%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.70%1.75%0.05%
TSLATesla Inc1.34%1.47%0.13%

94.8% of ENHU is already inside IWB.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ENHUIWB

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ENHU or IWB?

ENHU has an expense ratio of 0.22% while IWB charges 0.15%. IWB is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ENHU or IWB?

Over the past year ENHU returned +15.86% vs +16.56% for IWB, so IWB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ENHU and IWB?

94.8% of ENHU's money is in holdings IWB also owns. 77.1% of IWB's is in holdings ENHU also owns. They hold 318 positions in common, counted across the 350 positions we hold weights for in ENHU and 1,024 in IWB.

Which pays a higher dividend, ENHU or IWB?

ENHU yields 0.75% while IWB yields 0.92%, so IWB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IWB better than ENHU?

IWB has a lower expense ratio. IWB led over 1Y. IWB is less concentrated, with 36.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.