EQRR vs VYM
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, EQRR or VYM?
EQRR has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EQRR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EQRR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $42M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 50 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +32.74%Best | +11.83% |
| 1Y Return | +39.32%Best | +15.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.50%Best | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.59%Best | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.0% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,910Best | $17,241 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.9% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.2 years).
EQRR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
EQRR vs VYM Performance
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EQRR returned +39.32% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, EQRR is up 32.74% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Over three years, EQRR compounded at +21.50% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.59% and +11.51% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, EQRR has the edge at +9.84% annualized vs +9.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EQRR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.0% compared with 14.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for EQRR and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EQRR charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQRR currently yields 1.03% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
54.6% of EQRR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 13.7% of VYM's money is in holdings EQRR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
25 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EQRR and 602 in VYM, against full books of 50 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 602 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 548 positions EQRR does not, 84.2% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 6.94%, XOM 2.70%, JNJ 2.58%, ABBV 1.83%, BAC 1.65%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EQRR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co | 1.91% | 3.83% | 1.92% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 2.99% | 1.54% | 1.45% |
| COPConocophillips Common | 2.95% | 0.65% | 2.30% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp | 3.11% | 0.43% | 2.68% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.56% | 1.76% | 0.20% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc. | 2.98% | 0.31% | 2.67% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corporation | 3.00% | 0.22% | 2.78% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 3.02% | 0.18% | 2.84% |
| PRCentennial Resource Development Inc. | 3.06% | 0.07% | 2.99% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy | 2.93% | 0.15% | 2.78% |
54.6% of EQRR is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EQRR or VYM?
EQRR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EQRR or VYM?
Over the past year EQRR returned +39.32% vs +15.96% for VYM, so EQRR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), EQRR annualized +9.84% vs +9.80% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EQRR or VYM?
EQRR has been the more volatile fund at 25.0% annualized versus 14.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EQRR -59.5% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both EQRR and VYM?
EQRR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EQRR and VYM?
54.6% of EQRR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 13.7% of VYM's is in holdings EQRR also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EQRR and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQRR or VYM?
EQRR yields 1.03% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than EQRR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EQRR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.