EQTY vs NANC
Kovitz Core Equity ETF vs Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF
Which is better, EQTY or NANC?
NANC has been ahead.
NANC has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. EQTY is less concentrated, with 42.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EQTY | NANC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.72%Best |
| AUM | $1.4B | $298M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.18% |
| Holdings | 39 | 181 |
| YTD Return | +8.78% | +13.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.61% | +15.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.28% | +23.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 14.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.3%Best | -20.9% |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $16,621 | $20,418Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.4%Best | 47.5% |
| Fund Family | Kovitz Investment Group | Subversive Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 28, 2011 | Feb 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.7 years).
EQTY vs NANC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
EQTY vs NANC Performance
Kovitz Core Equity ETF (EQTY) is an ETF from Kovitz Investment Group and Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF (NANC) is an ETF from Subversive Capital. Over the past year EQTY returned +13.61% while NANC returned +15.98%. Year to date, EQTY is up 8.78% versus a gain of 13.64% for NANC.
Over three years, EQTY compounded at +17.28% per year against +23.88% for NANC. Across the full 4-year window we track, NANC has the edge at +21.28% annualized vs +14.72%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 12.3% for EQTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.3% for EQTY and -20.9% for NANC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EQTY charges 0.99% per year while NANC charges 0.72%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $72 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQTY currently yields 0.02% against 0.18% for NANC.
Holdings Overlap
40.8% of EQTY's money is in holdings NANC also owns. 39.0% of NANC's money is in holdings EQTY also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in EQTY and 89 in NANC, against full books of 39 and 181.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 74 positions for NANC that do not appear in our book for EQTY (60.2% of the fund), and 24 for EQTY that do not appear in NANC (54.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EQTY | Weight in NANC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.09% | 6.66% | 1.57% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.01% | 5.73% | 1.72% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.14% | 4.69% | 1.55% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 4.08% | 2.94% | 1.14% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.05% | 4.52% | 2.47% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.72% | 4.41% | 2.69% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.25% | 2.37% | 0.88% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 4.57% | 0.18% | 4.39% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.50% | 0.23% | 4.27% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 2.06% | 2.54% | 0.48% |
40.8% of EQTY is already inside NANC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EQTY or NANC?
EQTY has an expense ratio of 0.99% while NANC charges 0.72%. NANC is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EQTY or NANC?
Over the past year EQTY returned +13.61% vs +15.98% for NANC, so NANC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EQTY annualized +14.72% vs +21.28% for NANC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EQTY or NANC?
NANC has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 12.3% for EQTY. Worst drawdown: EQTY -17.3% vs NANC -20.9%.
Should I hold both EQTY and NANC?
EQTY and NANC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EQTY and NANC?
40.8% of EQTY's money is in holdings NANC also owns. 39.0% of NANC's is in holdings EQTY also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in EQTY and 89 in NANC.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQTY or NANC?
EQTY yields 0.02% while NANC yields 0.18%, so NANC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NANC better than EQTY?
NANC has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. EQTY is less concentrated, with 42.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.