EQUL vs FNDX
NYLI Engender Equality ETF vs Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF
Which is better, EQUL or FNDX?
Each has led over a different period.
FNDX has a lower expense ratio. EQUL led over 1Y, FNDX over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EQUL | FNDX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.25%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $28.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.77% | 1.50% |
| Holdings | 76 | 736 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.2% | -19.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $11,354 | $13,666Best |
| Fund Family | INDEXIQ ETF TRUST | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2021 | Aug 15, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 694 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. EQUL has data through Nov 19, 2024 and FNDX through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 21, 2021 to Nov 19, 2024 (3.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EQUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 16.7% for FNDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.2% for EQUL and -19.1% for FNDX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EQUL charges 0.45% per year while FNDX charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $25 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQUL currently yields 1.77% against 1.50% for FNDX.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EQUL and FNDX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EQUL or FNDX?
EQUL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while FNDX charges 0.25%. FNDX is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, EQUL or FNDX?
EQUL has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 16.7% for FNDX. Worst drawdown: EQUL -25.2% vs FNDX -19.1%.
Should I hold both EQUL and FNDX?
EQUL and FNDX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQUL or FNDX?
EQUL yields 1.77% while FNDX yields 1.50%, so EQUL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FNDX better than EQUL?
FNDX has a lower expense ratio. EQUL led over 1Y, FNDX over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.