ESPO vs VTI
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ESPO or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ESPO led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESPO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $255M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -5.64% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -13.21% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.05%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.69% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.0% | 17.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,879 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.2% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 17, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8 years).
ESPO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
ESPO vs VTI Performance
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ESPO returned -13.21% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, ESPO is down 5.64% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, ESPO compounded at +25.05% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.69% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ESPO has the edge at +16.85% annualized vs +13.93%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ESPO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 17.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.0% for ESPO and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESPO charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESPO currently yields 1.33% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
22.8% of ESPO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings ESPO also owns.
ESPO and VTI share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ESPO and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 50 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,152 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ESPO (97.5% of the fund), and 0 for ESPO that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
22.8% of ESPO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESPO or VTI?
ESPO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ESPO or VTI?
Over the past year ESPO returned -13.21% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ESPO annualized +16.85% vs +13.93% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ESPO or VTI?
ESPO has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 17.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ESPO -51.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ESPO and VTI?
ESPO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ESPO and VTI?
22.8% of ESPO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings ESPO also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ESPO and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESPO or VTI?
ESPO yields 1.33% while VTI yields 1.06%, so ESPO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ESPO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ESPO led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.