ESSC vs IVV
Eventide Small Cap ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ESSC or IVV?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. ESSC is less concentrated, with 7.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESSC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 1,117 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +8.23% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.50% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.2% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,169 | $11,621Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 7.6%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Eventide | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
ESSC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
ESSC vs IVV Performance
Eventide Small Cap ETF (ESSC) is an ETF from Eventide and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ESSC returned +11.50% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, ESSC is up 8.23% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ESSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 12.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.2% for ESSC and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESSC charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESSC currently yields 0.60% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
5.2% of ESSC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.8% of IVV's money is in holdings ESSC also owns.
ESSC and IVV share little of their money.
21 positions in common, counted across the 357 positions we hold weights for in ESSC and 506 in IVV, against full books of 1,117 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 479 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ESSC (98.6% of the fund), and 328 for ESSC that do not appear in IVV (93.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ESSC | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STLDSteel Dynamics Inc | 0.54% | 0.05% | 0.49% |
| PNWPinnacle West Corp | 0.57% | 0.02% | 0.55% |
| CPTCamden Property Trust Common Stock | 0.50% | 0.01% | 0.49% |
| CIENCiena Corp | 0.40% | 0.08% | 0.32% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.22% |
| GNRCGenerac Holdings, Inc. | 0.29% | 0.02% | 0.27% |
| JKHYJack Henry & Associates Inc | 0.28% | 0.02% | 0.26% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc - Common | 0.24% | 0.06% | 0.18% |
| FDSFactset Research Systems Inc. | 0.27% | 0.01% | 0.26% |
| SWKSSkyworks Solutions Inc. | 0.23% | 0.02% | 0.21% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ESSC and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESSC or IVV?
ESSC has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ESSC or IVV?
Over the past year ESSC returned +11.50% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ESSC annualized +11.69% vs +16.21% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ESSC or IVV?
ESSC has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 12.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ESSC -12.2% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both ESSC and IVV?
ESSC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ESSC and IVV?
5.2% of ESSC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.8% of IVV's is in holdings ESSC also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 357 positions we hold weights for in ESSC and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESSC or IVV?
ESSC yields 0.60% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ESSC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. ESSC is less concentrated, with 7.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.