ETFT vs IVV

ETFT vs IVV

Which is better, ETFT or IVV?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.2%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricETFTIVV
Expense Ratio1.00%0.03%Best
AUM$8M$896.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.10%
Holdings58508
YTD Return+2.19%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Top 10 Weight52.2%38.9%Best
Fund FamilyFundsmith LLP (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 1, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ETFT vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ETFT vs IVV Performance

Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) is an ETF from Fundsmith LLP (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ETFT is up 2.19% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ETFT charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETFT currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

ETFT already in IVV66.7%
IVV already in ETFT15.8%

66.7% of ETFT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 15.8% of IVV's money is in holdings ETFT also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

21 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in ETFT and 506 in IVV, against full books of 58 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 479 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ETFT (83.6% of the fund), and 2 for ETFT that do not appear in IVV (14.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ETFTWeight in IVVDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.62%5.76%3.14%
WATWaters Corp.6.22%0.06%6.16%
VVisa Inc Class A4.67%0.93%3.74%
MAMastercard Inc4.81%0.67%4.14%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.94%3.00%1.06%
VEEVVeeva Systems Inc4.56%0.06%4.50%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.13%2.42%0.29%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.3.81%0.44%3.37%
SYKStryker Corp4.08%0.14%3.94%
UBERUber Technologies Inc3.49%0.21%3.28%

66.7% of ETFT is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ETFTIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ETFT or IVV?

ETFT has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ETFT and IVV?

66.7% of ETFT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 15.8% of IVV's is in holdings ETFT also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in ETFT and 506 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, ETFT or IVV?

ETFT yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than ETFT?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.