ETHA vs IVV
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ETHA or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ETHA led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETHA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8.7B | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +132.78%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +76.61%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 136.4% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.9% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $20,741Best | $14,227 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
ETHA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
ETHA vs IVV Performance
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ETHA returned +76.61% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, ETHA is up 132.78% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETHA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 136.4% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.9% for ETHA and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETHA charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETHA currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ETHA and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETHA or IVV?
ETHA has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETHA or IVV?
Over the past year ETHA returned +76.61% vs +17.54% for IVV, so ETHA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ETHA annualized +39.32% vs +17.38% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETHA or IVV?
ETHA has been the more volatile fund at 136.4% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ETHA -67.9% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both ETHA and IVV?
ETHA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETHA or IVV?
ETHA yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ETHA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ETHA led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.