ETHU vs QQQY
2x Ether ETF vs Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF
Which is better, ETHU or QQQY?
QQQY has been ahead.
QQQY has a lower expense ratio. QQQY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETHU | QQQY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.97% | 1.01%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $192M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 33.38% |
| Holdings | 4 | 10 |
| YTD Return | -59.38% | +17.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | -79.97% | +20.86%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +28.44% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 153.0% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -96.5% | -12.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $776 | $18,773Best |
| Fund Family | Volatility Shares, LLC | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | Sep 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 4, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
ETHU vs QQQY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
ETHU vs QQQY Performance
2x Ether ETF (ETHU) is an ETF from Volatility Shares, LLC and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF (QQQY) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year ETHU returned -79.97% while QQQY returned +20.86%. Year to date, ETHU is down 59.38% versus a gain of 17.03% for QQQY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETHU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 153.0% compared with 16.7% for QQQY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.5% for ETHU and -12.6% for QQQY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETHU charges 2.97% per year while QQQY charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $297 vs $101 annually, a gap of $196 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETHU currently yields 1.52% against 33.38% for QQQY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ETHU and QQQY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETHU or QQQY?
ETHU has an expense ratio of 2.97% while QQQY charges 1.01%. QQQY is the cheaper option, by $196 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETHU or QQQY?
Over the past year ETHU returned -79.97% vs +20.86% for QQQY, so QQQY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ETHU annualized -65.53% vs +30.01% for QQQY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETHU or QQQY?
ETHU has been the more volatile fund at 153.0% annualized versus 16.7% for QQQY. Worst drawdown: ETHU -96.5% vs QQQY -12.6%.
Should I hold both ETHU and QQQY?
ETHU and QQQY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETHU or QQQY?
ETHU yields 1.52% while QQQY yields 33.38%, so QQQY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQY better than ETHU?
QQQY has a lower expense ratio. QQQY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.