ETJ vs GJUN
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund vs FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Which is better, ETJ or GJUN?
GJUN has been ahead.
GJUN has a lower expense ratio. GJUN led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETJ | GJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.11% | 0.85%Best |
| AUM | $614M | $511M |
| Dividend Yield | 8.55% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 74 | 10 |
| YTD Return | -1.86% | +6.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.01% | +8.70%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.94% | +12.00%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.70% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1% | 5.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.3% | -11.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $12,919 | $14,082Best |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2007 | Jun 16, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
ETJ vs GJUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
ETJ vs GJUN Performance
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) is an ETF from Eaton Vance and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year ETJ returned -1.01% while GJUN returned +8.70%. Year to date, ETJ is down 1.86% versus a gain of 6.43% for GJUN.
Over three years, ETJ compounded at +10.94% per year against +12.00% for GJUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.1% compared with 5.9% for GJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for ETJ and -11.0% for GJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETJ charges 1.11% per year while GJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $111 vs $85 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETJ currently yields 8.55% against 0.00% for GJUN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ETJ and GJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETJ or GJUN?
ETJ has an expense ratio of 1.11% while GJUN charges 0.85%. GJUN is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETJ or GJUN?
Over the past year ETJ returned -1.01% vs +8.70% for GJUN, so GJUN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETJ or GJUN?
ETJ has been the more volatile fund at 10.1% annualized versus 5.9% for GJUN. Worst drawdown: ETJ -18.3% vs GJUN -11.0%.
Should I hold both ETJ and GJUN?
ETJ and GJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETJ or GJUN?
ETJ yields 8.55% while GJUN yields 0.00%, so ETJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GJUN better than ETJ?
GJUN has a lower expense ratio. GJUN led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.