ETU vs MSTU
T-REX 2X LONG ETHER DAILY TARGET ETF vs T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
Which is better, ETU or MSTU?
MSTU has been ahead.
ETU has a lower expense ratio. MSTU led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETU | MSTU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95%Best | 1.05% |
| AUM | $15M | $788M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 3 | 24 |
| YTD Return | -59.28% | +284.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | -79.96% | -12.54%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 160.4%Best | 1252.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.0% | - |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $2,484 | $4,621Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | REX Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Leverage Strategy |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2024 | Sep 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
ETU vs MSTU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
ETU vs MSTU Performance
T-REX 2X LONG ETHER DAILY TARGET ETF (ETU) is an ETF from REX Shares and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year ETU returned -79.96% while MSTU returned -12.54%. Year to date, ETU is down 59.28% versus a gain of 284.55% for MSTU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1252.6% compared with 160.4% for ETU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETU charges 0.95% per year while MSTU charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $105 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETU currently yields 0.00% against 0.07% for MSTU.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in ETU and 1 in MSTU, totalling 9.7% and 0.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in ETU and 1 in MSTU, against full books of 3 and 24.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ETU and MSTU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETU or MSTU?
ETU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while MSTU charges 1.05%. ETU is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETU or MSTU?
Over the past year ETU returned -79.96% vs -12.54% for MSTU, so MSTU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ETU annualized -50.16% vs -32.02% for MSTU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETU or MSTU?
MSTU has been the more volatile fund at 1252.6% annualized versus 160.4% for ETU.
Should I hold both ETU and MSTU?
ETU and MSTU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETU or MSTU?
ETU yields 0.00% while MSTU yields 0.07%, so MSTU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MSTU better than ETU?
ETU has a lower expense ratio. MSTU led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.