ETU vs MSTZ
T-REX 2X LONG ETHER DAILY TARGET ETF vs T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
Which is better, ETU or MSTZ?
Each has led over a different period.
ETU has a lower expense ratio. ETU led over the full window, MSTZ over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETU | MSTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95%Best | 1.05% |
| AUM | $15M | $90M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 3 | 9 |
| YTD Return | -59.28%Best | -81.14% |
| 1Y Return | -79.96% | -47.19%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 160.4%Best | 184.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.0%Best | -98.1% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $2,484Best | $244 |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | REX Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Leverage Strategy |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2024 | Sep 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
ETU vs MSTZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
ETU vs MSTZ Performance
T-REX 2X LONG ETHER DAILY TARGET ETF (ETU) is an ETF from REX Shares and T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year ETU returned -79.96% while MSTZ returned -47.19%. Year to date, ETU is down 59.28% versus a loss of 81.14% for MSTZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 184.1% compared with 160.4% for ETU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.0% for ETU and -98.1% for MSTZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETU charges 0.95% per year while MSTZ charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $105 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETU currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for MSTZ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ETU and MSTZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETU or MSTZ?
ETU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while MSTZ charges 1.05%. ETU is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETU or MSTZ?
Over the past year ETU returned -79.96% vs -47.19% for MSTZ, so MSTZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ETU annualized -50.16% vs -84.37% for MSTZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETU or MSTZ?
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 184.1% annualized versus 160.4% for ETU. Worst drawdown: ETU -95.0% vs MSTZ -98.1%.
Should I hold both ETU and MSTZ?
ETU and MSTZ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETU or MSTZ?
ETU yields 0.00% while MSTZ yields 0.00%, so ETU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MSTZ better than ETU?
ETU has a lower expense ratio. ETU led over the full window, MSTZ over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.