FALN vs IVV
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FALN or IVV?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FALN is less concentrated, with 18.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FALN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.78% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 156 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -0.73% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.25% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.55% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.82% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.0%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,492 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.0%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 14, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 17, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (10.3 years).
FALN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.3 years both funds cover.
FALN vs IVV Performance
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FALN returned +0.25% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, FALN is down 0.73% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, FALN compounded at +8.55% per year against +22.46% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +2.82% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.40% annualized vs +3.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 9.4% for FALN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.0% for FALN and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FALN charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FALN currently yields 6.78% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
2.8% of FALN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings FALN also owns.
FALN and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 153 positions we hold weights for in FALN and 506 in IVV, against full books of 156 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 153 and 506 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 499 positions FALN does not, 99.3% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.29%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 3.68%, GOOGL 3.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FALN | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlk Csh Fnd Treasury Sl Agency | 2.79% | 0.10% | 2.69% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FALN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FALN or IVV?
FALN has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FALN or IVV?
Over the past year FALN returned +0.25% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FALN annualized +3.33% vs +14.40% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FALN or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 9.4% for FALN. Worst drawdown: FALN -30.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both FALN and IVV?
FALN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FALN and IVV?
2.8% of FALN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's is in holdings FALN also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 153 positions we hold weights for in FALN and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FALN or IVV?
FALN yields 6.78% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FALN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FALN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FALN is less concentrated, with 18.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.