FAPR vs PSMJ

FAPR vs PSMJ

Which is better, FAPR or PSMJ?

Each has led over a different period.

PSMJ has a lower expense ratio. FAPR led over 1Y, PSMJ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: PSMJHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFAPRPSMJ
Expense Ratio0.85%0.49%Best
AUM$1.4B$108M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1012
YTD Return+8.21%Best+7.57%
1Y Return+10.78%Best+10.19%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.68%+13.78%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.84%+10.75%Best
Volatility (annualized)9.1%7.8%Best
Max Drawdown-16.0%-10.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,274$16,662Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Pacer ETFs
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionApr 16, 2021Jun 30, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).

FAPR vs PSMJ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.

Compare FAPR against instead:FAPR vs SPYFAPR vs QQQFAPR vs VOOFAPR vs VTIPSMJ against:PSMJ vs VXUS

FAPR vs PSMJ Performance

FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate July ETF (PSMJ) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year FAPR returned +10.78% while PSMJ returned +10.19%. Year to date, FAPR is up 8.21% versus a gain of 7.57% for PSMJ.

Over three years, FAPR compounded at +13.68% per year against +13.78% for PSMJ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.84% and +10.75% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FAPR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.1% compared with 7.8% for PSMJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for FAPR and -10.9% for PSMJ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FAPR charges 0.85% per year while PSMJ charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $49 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FAPR currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PSMJ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FAPR and PSMJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FAPRPSMJ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FAPR or PSMJ?

FAPR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while PSMJ charges 0.49%. PSMJ is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FAPR or PSMJ?

Over the past year FAPR returned +10.78% vs +10.19% for PSMJ, so FAPR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FAPR or PSMJ?

FAPR has been the more volatile fund at 9.1% annualized versus 7.8% for PSMJ. Worst drawdown: FAPR -16.0% vs PSMJ -10.9%.

Should I hold both FAPR and PSMJ?

FAPR and PSMJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FAPR or PSMJ?

FAPR yields 0.00% while PSMJ yields 0.00%, so PSMJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PSMJ better than FAPR?

PSMJ has a lower expense ratio. FAPR led over 1Y, PSMJ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.