FAS vs NFLU

FAS vs NFLU

Which is better, FAS or NFLU?

FAS has been ahead.

FAS has a lower expense ratio. FAS led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: FASHigher Returns: FAS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFASNFLU
Expense Ratio0.89%Best1.05%
AUM$2.1B$27M
Dividend Yield10.41%0.02%
Holdings1765
YTD Return-11.11%Best-51.23%
1Y Return-4.59%Best-74.20%
3Y Return (annualized)+40.50%-
5Y Return (annualized)+5.72%-
Volatility (annualized)45.1%Best71.3%
Max Drawdown-43.1%Best-81.8%
$10,000 over 2 years$12,724Best$6,104
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustREX Shares
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityTrading-Leveraged Equity
InceptionNov 6, 2008Sep 27, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).

FAS vs NFLU growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.

Compare FAS against instead:FAS vs SPYFAS vs QQQFAS vs VOOFAS vs VTINFLU against:NFLU vs VXUS

FAS vs NFLU Performance

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and T-Rex 2X Long NFLX Daily Target ETF (NFLU) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year FAS returned -4.59% while NFLU returned -74.20%. Year to date, FAS is down 11.11% versus a loss of 51.23% for NFLU.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NFLU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 71.3% compared with 45.1% for FAS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.1% for FAS and -81.8% for NFLU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FAS charges 0.89% per year while NFLU charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $105 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FAS currently yields 10.41% against 0.02% for NFLU.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FAS and NFLU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FASNFLU

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FAS or NFLU?

FAS has an expense ratio of 0.89% while NFLU charges 1.05%. FAS is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FAS or NFLU?

Over the past year FAS returned -4.59% vs -74.20% for NFLU, so FAS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FAS annualized +12.80% vs -21.87% for NFLU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FAS or NFLU?

NFLU has been the more volatile fund at 71.3% annualized versus 45.1% for FAS. Worst drawdown: FAS -43.1% vs NFLU -81.8%.

Should I hold both FAS and NFLU?

FAS and NFLU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FAS or NFLU?

FAS yields 10.41% while NFLU yields 0.02%, so FAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NFLU better than FAS?

FAS has a lower expense ratio. FAS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.