FAS vs TARK
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF vs Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
Which is better, FAS or TARK?
FAS has been ahead.
FAS has a lower expense ratio. FAS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAS | TARK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89%Best | 1.48% |
| AUM | $2.1B | $585,773.74 |
| Dividend Yield | 10.41% | 26.41% |
| Holdings | 176 | 10 |
| YTD Return | -11.11% | -3.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.59%Best | -25.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.50%Best | +32.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.72% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 54.1%Best | 84.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.9%Best | -77.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $20,520Best | $7,834 |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Tradr ETFs |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2008 | Apr 28, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 2, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.5 years).
FAS vs TARK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
FAS vs TARK Performance
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year FAS returned -4.59% while TARK returned -25.61%. Year to date, FAS is down 11.11% versus a loss of 3.65% for TARK.
Over three years, FAS compounded at +40.50% per year against +32.73% for TARK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 84.6% compared with 54.1% for FAS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.9% for FAS and -77.8% for TARK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FAS charges 0.89% per year while TARK charges 1.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $148 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FAS currently yields 10.41% against 26.41% for TARK.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FAS and TARK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FAS or TARK?
FAS has an expense ratio of 0.89% while TARK charges 1.48%. FAS is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FAS or TARK?
Over the past year FAS returned -4.59% vs -25.61% for TARK, so FAS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FAS or TARK?
TARK has been the more volatile fund at 84.6% annualized versus 54.1% for FAS. Worst drawdown: FAS -46.9% vs TARK -77.8%.
Should I hold both FAS and TARK?
FAS and TARK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FAS or TARK?
FAS yields 10.41% while TARK yields 26.41%, so TARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TARK better than FAS?
FAS has a lower expense ratio. FAS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.