FAUG vs FJUL
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - August vs FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - July
Which is better, FAUG or FJUL?
FJUL has been ahead.
FJUL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAUG | FJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +9.42% | +10.19%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.36% | +13.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.16% | +16.61%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.29% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.8%Tie | 9.8%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -15.9% | -13.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,592 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2019 | Jul 16, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 20, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.2 years).
FAUG vs FJUL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
FAUG vs FJUL Performance
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FAUG returned +12.36% while FJUL returned +13.14%. Year to date, FAUG is up 9.42% versus a gain of 10.19% for FJUL.
Over three years, FAUG compounded at +15.16% per year against +16.61% for FJUL; over five years the annualized figures are +9.29% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FJUL has the edge at +11.95% annualized vs +10.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FAUG and FJUL have been equally volatile, both at 9.8% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for FAUG and -13.1% for FJUL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FAUG charges 0.85% per year while FJUL charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FAUG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for FJUL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FAUG and FJUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FAUG or FJUL?
FAUG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while FJUL charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FAUG or FJUL?
Over the past year FAUG returned +12.36% vs +13.14% for FJUL, so FJUL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FAUG annualized +10.22% vs +11.95% for FJUL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FAUG or FJUL?
FAUG and FJUL have been equally volatile, both at 9.8% annualized. Worst drawdown: FAUG -15.9% vs FJUL -13.1%.
Should I hold both FAUG and FJUL?
FAUG and FJUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FAUG or FJUL?
FAUG yields 0.00% while FJUL yields 0.00%, so FJUL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FJUL better than FAUG?
FJUL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.