FAUG vs XDEC

FAUG vs XDEC

Which is better, FAUG or XDEC?

FAUG has been ahead.

FAUG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: FAUG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFAUGXDEC
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$1.4B$208M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1012
YTD Return+9.42%Best+7.41%
1Y Return+12.36%Best+9.79%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.16%Best+9.84%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.29%-
Volatility (annualized)10.1%6.8%Best
Max Drawdown-15.9%-11.8%Best
$10,000 over 4.8 years$15,344Best$14,533
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionNov 7, 2019Dec 17, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 20, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).

FAUG vs XDEC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.

Compare FAUG against instead:FAUG vs SPYFAUG vs QQQFAUG vs VOOFAUG vs VTIXDEC against:XDEC vs VXUS

FAUG vs XDEC Performance

FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FAUG returned +12.36% while XDEC returned +9.79%. Year to date, FAUG is up 9.42% versus a gain of 7.41% for XDEC.

Over three years, FAUG compounded at +15.16% per year against +9.84% for XDEC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FAUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.1% compared with 6.8% for XDEC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for FAUG and -11.8% for XDEC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FAUG charges 0.85% per year while XDEC charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FAUG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XDEC.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FAUG and XDEC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FAUGXDEC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FAUG or XDEC?

FAUG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while XDEC charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, FAUG or XDEC?

Over the past year FAUG returned +12.36% vs +9.79% for XDEC, so FAUG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FAUG or XDEC?

FAUG has been the more volatile fund at 10.1% annualized versus 6.8% for XDEC. Worst drawdown: FAUG -15.9% vs XDEC -11.8%.

Should I hold both FAUG and XDEC?

FAUG and XDEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FAUG or XDEC?

FAUG yields 0.00% while XDEC yields 0.00%, so XDEC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XDEC better than FAUG?

FAUG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.