FB vs VTI
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FB or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FB | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 501 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.40% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.36% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.3%Best | 11.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,515 | $12,697Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
FB vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
FB vs VTI Performance
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF (FB) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FB returned +11.36% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, FB is up 8.40% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.4% compared with 3.3% for FB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for FB and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FB charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FB currently yields 1.83% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 87.5% of VTI's money is in holdings FB also owns.
Stated as a floor: for FB, our book for it covers 85.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of VTI is already inside FB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
485 positions in common, counted across the 502 positions we hold weights for in FB and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 501 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.66% | 6.88% | 0.22% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.38% | 6.30% | 0.08% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.88% | 5.11% | 0.23% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.23% | 3.41% | 0.18% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.67% | 2.70% | 0.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.13% | 2.38% | 0.25% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.12% | 2.12% | 0.00% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.91% | 1.70% | 0.21% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.36% | 1.46% | 0.10% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.32% | 1.40% | 0.08% |
87.5% of VTI is already inside FB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FB or VTI?
FB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FB or VTI?
Over the past year FB returned +11.36% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FB annualized +11.46% vs +20.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.4% annualized versus 3.3% for FB. Worst drawdown: FB -1.8% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both FB and VTI?
FB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FB and VTI?
At least 87.5% of VTI's money is in holdings FB also owns. Our book for FB is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 485 positions in common, counted across the 502 positions we hold weights for in FB and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FB or VTI?
FB yields 1.83% while VTI yields 1.06%, so FB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FB?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.