FBCG vs FFOG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Which is better, FBCG or FFOG?
Nearly the same fund. FFOG costs less.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCG | FFOG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.41%Best |
| AUM | $7.6B | $386M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 245 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +12.59%Best | +8.34% |
| 1Y Return | +17.09%Best | +7.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.54%Best | +25.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.04% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6%Best | 20.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.9% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $20,516Best | $19,417 |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.5% | 55.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Nov 6, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
FBCG vs FFOG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FBCG vs FFOG Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year FBCG returned +17.09% while FFOG returned +7.46%. Year to date, FBCG is up 12.59% versus a gain of 8.34% for FFOG.
Over three years, FBCG compounded at +27.54% per year against +25.71% for FFOG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 18.6% for FBCG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.9% for FBCG and -25.4% for FFOG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCG charges 0.57% per year while FFOG charges 0.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $41 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCG currently yields 0.03% against 0.00% for FFOG.
Holdings Overlap
66.2% of FBCG's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 91.1% of FFOG's money is in holdings FBCG also owns.
Most of FFOG is already inside FBCG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
33 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 41 in FFOG, against full books of 245 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 4 positions for FFOG that do not appear in our book for FBCG (4.3% of the fund), and 153 for FBCG that do not appear in FFOG (32.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBCG | Weight in FFOG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.68% | 10.05% | 5.63% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 8.64% | 7.96% | 0.68% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.22% | 5.50% | 3.72% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.97% | 8.49% | 3.52% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.56% | 3.90% | 1.66% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.11% | 3.45% | 0.66% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 4.98% | 2.56% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 1.84% | 3.92% | 2.08% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.13% | 4.29% | 3.16% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.65% | 2.01% | 0.64% |
91.1% of FFOG is already inside FBCG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCG or FFOG?
FBCG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while FFOG charges 0.41%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBCG or FFOG?
Over the past year FBCG returned +17.09% vs +7.46% for FFOG, so FBCG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBCG or FFOG?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 18.6% for FBCG. Worst drawdown: FBCG -27.9% vs FFOG -25.4%.
Should I hold both FBCG and FFOG?
FBCG and FFOG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCG and FFOG?
91.1% of FFOG's money is in holdings FBCG also owns. 91.1% of FFOG's is in holdings FBCG also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 41 in FFOG.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCG or FFOG?
FBCG yields 0.03% while FFOG yields 0.00%, so FBCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFOG better than FBCG?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.