FBCG vs HQGO
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, FBCG or HQGO?
FBCG has been ahead.
HQGO has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. HQGO is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCG | HQGO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.34%Best |
| AUM | $7.6B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.51% |
| Holdings | 245 | 192 |
| YTD Return | +12.59% | +12.84%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.09%Best | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.04% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.9% | -20.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,913Best | $17,373 |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.5% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Dec 5, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
FBCG vs HQGO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FBCG vs HQGO Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) is an ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year FBCG returned +17.09% while HQGO returned +15.94%. Year to date, FBCG is up 12.59% versus a gain of 12.84% for HQGO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 12.6% for HQGO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.9% for FBCG and -20.9% for HQGO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCG charges 0.57% per year while HQGO charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $34 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCG currently yields 0.03% against 0.51% for HQGO.
Holdings Overlap
75.4% of FBCG's money is in holdings HQGO also owns. 64.1% of HQGO's money is in holdings FBCG also owns.
Most of FBCG is already inside HQGO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
61 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 190 in HQGO, against full books of 245 and 192.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 127 positions for HQGO that do not appear in our book for FBCG (35.7% of the fund), and 120 for FBCG that do not appear in HQGO (20.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBCG | Weight in HQGO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.68% | 5.49% | 10.19% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.22% | 5.37% | 3.85% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 8.64% | 4.82% | 3.82% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.56% | 4.71% | 0.85% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.97% | 4.33% | 0.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.11% | 3.36% | 0.75% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 3.11% | 0.69% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.65% | 2.00% | 0.65% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.37% | 2.27% | 0.10% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.26% | 2.59% | 1.33% |
75.4% of FBCG is already inside HQGO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCG or HQGO?
FBCG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while HQGO charges 0.34%. HQGO is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBCG or HQGO?
Over the past year FBCG returned +17.09% vs +15.94% for HQGO, so FBCG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBCG or HQGO?
FBCG has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 12.6% for HQGO. Worst drawdown: FBCG -27.9% vs HQGO -20.9%.
Should I hold both FBCG and HQGO?
FBCG and HQGO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCG and HQGO?
75.4% of FBCG's money is in holdings HQGO also owns. 64.1% of HQGO's is in holdings FBCG also owns. They hold 61 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 190 in HQGO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCG or HQGO?
FBCG yields 0.03% while HQGO yields 0.51%, so HQGO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HQGO better than FBCG?
HQGO has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. HQGO is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.