FBCG vs REGS
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, FBCG or REGS?
FBCG has been ahead.
REGS has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCG | REGS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $7.6B | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 245 | 124 |
| YTD Return | +12.59% | +13.80%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.09% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.04% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.5% | 51.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Mar 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FBCG vs REGS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FBCG vs REGS Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, FBCG is up 12.59% versus a gain of 13.80% for REGS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCG charges 0.57% per year while REGS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $35 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCG currently yields 0.03% against 0.00% for REGS.
Holdings Overlap
64.6% of FBCG's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 66.8% of REGS's money is in holdings FBCG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 55 in REGS, against full books of 245 and 124.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 32 positions for REGS that do not appear in our book for FBCG (30.2% of the fund), and 160 for FBCG that do not appear in REGS (31.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBCG | Weight in REGS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.68% | 10.73% | 4.95% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.22% | 7.36% | 1.86% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.56% | 4.97% | 0.59% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 8.64% | 1.55% | 7.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.11% | 5.23% | 1.12% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.97% | 2.35% | 2.62% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 4.70% | 2.28% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.37% | 4.51% | 2.14% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.65% | 3.89% | 1.24% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.26% | 3.44% | 2.18% |
66.8% of REGS is already inside FBCG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCG or REGS?
FBCG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while REGS charges 0.35%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCG and REGS?
66.8% of REGS's money is in holdings FBCG also owns. 66.8% of REGS's is in holdings FBCG also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 55 in REGS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCG or REGS?
FBCG yields 0.03% while REGS yields 0.00%, so FBCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REGS better than FBCG?
REGS has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.