FBCG vs TCHP
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Which is better, FBCG or TCHP?
FBCG has been ahead.
FBCG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FBCG is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCG | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57%Tie | 0.57%Tie |
| AUM | $7.6B | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 245 | 65 |
| YTD Return | +12.59%Best | +2.74% |
| 1Y Return | +17.09%Best | +5.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.54%Best | +21.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.04%Best | +9.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.3% | 19.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.6% | -42.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,457Best | $15,514 |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.5%Best | 59.3% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Aug 4, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 5, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.2 years).
FBCG vs TCHP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
FBCG vs TCHP Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year FBCG returned +17.09% while TCHP returned +5.10%. Year to date, FBCG is up 12.59% versus a gain of 2.74% for TCHP.
Over three years, FBCG compounded at +27.54% per year against +21.81% for TCHP; over five years the annualized figures are +13.04% and +9.18% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FBCG has the edge at +16.97% annualized vs +12.03%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 19.7% for TCHP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.6% for FBCG and -42.3% for TCHP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCG charges 0.57% per year while TCHP charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $57 annually. On income, FBCG currently yields 0.03% against 0.00% for TCHP.
Holdings Overlap
71.5% of FBCG's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 90.3% of TCHP's money is in holdings FBCG also owns.
Most of TCHP is already inside FBCG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
41 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 62 in TCHP, against full books of 245 and 65.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for TCHP that do not appear in our book for FBCG (8.9% of the fund), and 143 for FBCG that do not appear in TCHP (26.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBCG | Weight in TCHP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.68% | 17.43% | 1.75% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.22% | 4.94% | 4.28% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 8.64% | 5.50% | 3.14% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.56% | 5.92% | 0.36% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.11% | 5.79% | 1.68% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.97% | 3.60% | 1.37% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.26% | 5.94% | 5.68% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 3.53% | 1.11% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.65% | 3.05% | 0.40% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.26% | 2.92% | 1.66% |
90.3% of TCHP is already inside FBCG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCG or TCHP?
FBCG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while TCHP charges 0.57%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FBCG or TCHP?
Over the past year FBCG returned +17.09% vs +5.10% for TCHP, so FBCG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FBCG annualized +16.97% vs +12.03% for TCHP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBCG or TCHP?
FBCG has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 19.7% for TCHP. Worst drawdown: FBCG -43.6% vs TCHP -42.3%.
Should I hold both FBCG and TCHP?
FBCG and TCHP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCG and TCHP?
90.3% of TCHP's money is in holdings FBCG also owns. 90.3% of TCHP's is in holdings FBCG also owns. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 62 in TCHP.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCG or TCHP?
FBCG yields 0.03% while TCHP yields 0.00%, so FBCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TCHP better than FBCG?
FBCG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FBCG is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.