FBCG vs TFGZ
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, FBCG or TFGZ?
FBCG has been ahead.
FBCG has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCG | TFGZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $7.6B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 245 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +12.59% | +16.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.09% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.04% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.5% | 49.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Apr 1, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FBCG vs TFGZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FBCG vs TFGZ Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, FBCG is up 12.59% versus a gain of 16.33% for TFGZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCG charges 0.57% per year while TFGZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $79 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCG currently yields 0.03% against 0.00% for TFGZ.
Holdings Overlap
27.2% of FBCG's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 54.3% of TFGZ's money is in holdings FBCG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 42 in TFGZ, against full books of 245 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for TFGZ that do not appear in our book for FBCG (32.1% of the fund), and 166 for FBCG that do not appear in TFGZ (69.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBCG | Weight in TFGZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 8.64% | 12.16% | 3.52% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.56% | 7.18% | 1.62% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.11% | 6.00% | 1.89% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 3.77% | 1.35% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.37% | 3.40% | 1.03% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.85% | 3.34% | 2.49% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 0.52% | 3.30% | 2.78% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 0.09% | 2.62% | 2.53% |
| RDDTReddit Inc-Cl A | 0.18% | 2.28% | 2.10% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.10% | 2.20% | 2.10% |
54.3% of TFGZ is already inside FBCG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCG or TFGZ?
FBCG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while TFGZ charges 0.79%. FBCG is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCG and TFGZ?
54.3% of TFGZ's money is in holdings FBCG also owns. 54.3% of TFGZ's is in holdings FBCG also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 200 positions we hold weights for in FBCG and 42 in TFGZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCG or TFGZ?
FBCG yields 0.03% while TFGZ yields 0.00%, so FBCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TFGZ better than FBCG?
FBCG has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.