FBCV vs MAVF
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Which is better, FBCV or MAVF?
Each has led over a different period.
FBCV has a lower expense ratio. FBCV led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. FBCV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCV | MAVF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $184M | $93M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 0.37% |
| Holdings | 127 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +18.42%Best | +13.01% |
| 1Y Return | +24.20%Best | +19.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.61% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.11% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.8%Best | -16.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,206 | $13,491Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 54.6% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Matrix Asset Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Sep 16, 1983 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
FBCV vs MAVF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
FBCV vs MAVF Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors. Over the past year FBCV returned +24.20% while MAVF returned +19.46%. Year to date, FBCV is up 18.42% versus a gain of 13.01% for MAVF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 10.4% for FBCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.8% for FBCV and -16.4% for MAVF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCV charges 0.57% per year while MAVF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $75 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCV currently yields 1.25% against 0.37% for MAVF.
Holdings Overlap
23.3% of FBCV's money is in holdings MAVF also owns. 60.1% of MAVF's money is in holdings FBCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, FBCV as of Jul 31, 2026 and MAVF as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FBCV and 27 in MAVF, against full books of 127 and 29.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for MAVF that do not appear in our book for FBCV (39.9% of the fund), and 98 for FBCV that do not appear in MAVF (67.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBCV | Weight in MAVF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.24% | 8.61% | 3.37% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.46% | 6.38% | 1.08% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.64% | 7.06% | 2.42% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.01% | 7.81% | 7.80% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.04% | 5.73% | 4.69% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.31% | 3.34% | 2.03% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 1.04% | 3.21% | 2.17% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.00% | 3.98% | 3.98% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 1.14% | 2.72% | 1.58% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 0.87% | 2.87% | 2.00% |
60.1% of MAVF is already inside FBCV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCV or MAVF?
FBCV has an expense ratio of 0.57% while MAVF charges 0.75%. FBCV is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBCV or MAVF?
Over the past year FBCV returned +24.20% vs +19.46% for MAVF, so FBCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FBCV annualized +18.98% vs +20.58% for MAVF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBCV or MAVF?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 10.4% for FBCV. Worst drawdown: FBCV -10.8% vs MAVF -16.4%.
Should I hold both FBCV and MAVF?
FBCV and MAVF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCV and MAVF?
60.1% of MAVF's money is in holdings FBCV also owns. 60.1% of MAVF's is in holdings FBCV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FBCV and 27 in MAVF.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCV or MAVF?
FBCV yields 1.25% while MAVF yields 0.37%, so FBCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAVF better than FBCV?
FBCV has a lower expense ratio. FBCV led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. FBCV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.