FBCV vs MFSV
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Which is better, FBCV or MFSV?
FBCV has been ahead.
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. FBCV led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCV | MFSV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $184M | $618M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 1.41% |
| Holdings | 127 | 64 |
| YTD Return | +18.42%Best | +9.21% |
| 1Y Return | +24.20%Best | +12.64% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.61% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.11% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0% | 9.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.0% | -12.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,904Best | $11,981 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3% | 32.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | MFS Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Dec 5, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
FBCV vs MFSV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
FBCV vs MFSV Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Over the past year FBCV returned +24.20% while MFSV returned +12.64%. Year to date, FBCV is up 18.42% versus a gain of 9.21% for MFSV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.0% compared with 9.6% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.0% for FBCV and -12.7% for MFSV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCV charges 0.57% per year while MFSV charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $44 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCV currently yields 1.25% against 1.41% for MFSV.
Holdings Overlap
36.5% of FBCV's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 40.6% of MFSV's money is in holdings FBCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, FBCV as of Jul 31, 2026 and MFSV as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
21 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FBCV and 60 in MFSV, against full books of 127 and 64.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 39 positions for MFSV that do not appear in our book for FBCV (56.8% of the fund), and 89 for FBCV that do not appear in MFSV (54.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBCV | Weight in MFSV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.46% | 5.28% | 2.18% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.24% | 5.35% | 0.11% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.64% | 3.09% | 1.55% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 3.37% | 3.04% | 0.33% |
| BACBank Of America Corp | 2.64% | 2.25% | 0.39% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.79% | 2.14% | 0.35% |
| TRVThe Travelers Cos, Inc. | 2.10% | 1.76% | 0.34% |
| CICigna Corp. | 0.88% | 2.75% | 1.87% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.31% | 1.95% | 0.64% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.11% | 1.19% | 0.08% |
40.6% of MFSV is already inside FBCV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCV or MFSV?
FBCV has an expense ratio of 0.57% while MFSV charges 0.44%. MFSV is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBCV or MFSV?
Over the past year FBCV returned +24.20% vs +12.64% for MFSV, so FBCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FBCV annualized +14.36% vs +9.98% for MFSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBCV or MFSV?
FBCV has been the more volatile fund at 10.0% annualized versus 9.6% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: FBCV -13.0% vs MFSV -12.7%.
Should I hold both FBCV and MFSV?
FBCV and MFSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCV and MFSV?
40.6% of MFSV's money is in holdings FBCV also owns. 40.6% of MFSV's is in holdings FBCV also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FBCV and 60 in MFSV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCV or MFSV?
FBCV yields 1.25% while MFSV yields 1.41%, so MFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MFSV better than FBCV?
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. FBCV led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.