FBCV vs PJFV
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
Which is better, FBCV or PJFV?
PJFV has been ahead.
PJFV has a lower expense ratio. PJFV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FBCV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCV | PJFV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.33%Best |
| AUM | $184M | $183M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 127 | 37 |
| YTD Return | +18.42% | +20.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | +24.20% | +27.75%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.61% | +24.90%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.11% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1%Best | 11.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3%Best | -18.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $15,503 | $20,686Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 41.1% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Dec 12, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.8 years).
FBCV vs PJFV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
FBCV vs PJFV Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year FBCV returned +24.20% while PJFV returned +27.75%. Year to date, FBCV is up 18.42% versus a gain of 20.68% for PJFV.
Over three years, FBCV compounded at +16.61% per year against +24.90% for PJFV. Across the full 4-year window we track, PJFV has the edge at +21.08% annualized vs +12.23%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PJFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.7% compared with 11.1% for FBCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for FBCV and -18.1% for PJFV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCV charges 0.57% per year while PJFV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $33 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCV currently yields 1.25% against 0.57% for PJFV.
Holdings Overlap
30.6% of FBCV's money is in holdings PJFV also owns. 45.6% of PJFV's money is in holdings FBCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, FBCV as of Jul 31, 2026 and PJFV as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
14 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FBCV and 35 in PJFV, against full books of 127 and 37.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for PJFV that do not appear in our book for FBCV (45.0% of the fund), and 96 for FBCV that do not appear in PJFV (61.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBCV | Weight in PJFV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.46% | 4.67% | 2.79% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.24% | 6.30% | 1.06% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.64% | 5.66% | 1.02% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 3.37% | 4.01% | 0.64% |
| SHELShell Plc | 1.88% | 3.55% | 1.67% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.64% | 2.21% | 0.43% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.31% | 2.69% | 1.38% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 0.94% | 3.03% | 2.09% |
| TOLToll Bros Inc | 0.24% | 3.20% | 2.96% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.04% | 2.38% | 1.34% |
45.6% of PJFV is already inside FBCV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCV or PJFV?
FBCV has an expense ratio of 0.57% while PJFV charges 0.33%. PJFV is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBCV or PJFV?
Over the past year FBCV returned +24.20% vs +27.75% for PJFV, so PJFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FBCV annualized +12.23% vs +21.08% for PJFV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBCV or PJFV?
PJFV has been the more volatile fund at 11.7% annualized versus 11.1% for FBCV. Worst drawdown: FBCV -14.3% vs PJFV -18.1%.
Should I hold both FBCV and PJFV?
FBCV and PJFV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCV and PJFV?
45.6% of PJFV's money is in holdings FBCV also owns. 45.6% of PJFV's is in holdings FBCV also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FBCV and 35 in PJFV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCV or PJFV?
FBCV yields 1.25% while PJFV yields 0.57%, so FBCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJFV better than FBCV?
PJFV has a lower expense ratio. PJFV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FBCV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.