FBCV vs TVAL
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs T. Rowe Price Value ETF
Which is better, FBCV or TVAL?
TVAL has been ahead.
TVAL has a lower expense ratio. TVAL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. TVAL is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCV | TVAL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.33%Best |
| AUM | $184M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 0.97% |
| Holdings | 127 | 155 |
| YTD Return | +18.42% | +20.77%Best |
| 1Y Return | +24.20% | +27.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.61% | +20.43%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.11% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0%Best | 12.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3%Best | -15.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $15,774 | $17,223Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3% | 29.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Jun 14, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
FBCV vs TVAL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
FBCV vs TVAL Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year FBCV returned +24.20% while TVAL returned +27.42%. Year to date, FBCV is up 18.42% versus a gain of 20.77% for TVAL.
Over three years, FBCV compounded at +16.61% per year against +20.43% for TVAL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TVAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 11.0% for FBCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for FBCV and -15.8% for TVAL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCV charges 0.57% per year while TVAL charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $33 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCV currently yields 1.25% against 0.97% for TVAL.
Holdings Overlap
55.1% of FBCV's money is in holdings TVAL also owns. 51.4% of TVAL's money is in holdings FBCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
47 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FBCV and 148 in TVAL, against full books of 127 and 155.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 95 positions for TVAL that do not appear in our book for FBCV (44.6% of the fund), and 72 for FBCV that do not appear in TVAL (37.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBCV | Weight in TVAL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.46% | 6.50% | 0.96% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.64% | 5.78% | 1.14% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.24% | 5.15% | 0.09% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 3.37% | 2.02% | 1.35% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.79% | 1.94% | 0.15% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.64% | 1.02% | 1.62% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.30% | 1.09% | 1.21% |
| CBChubb Ltd Common Stock Usd 24.15 | 1.64% | 1.60% | 0.04% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 1.23% | 1.69% | 0.46% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.53% | 1.20% | 0.33% |
55.1% of FBCV is already inside TVAL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCV or TVAL?
FBCV has an expense ratio of 0.57% while TVAL charges 0.33%. TVAL is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBCV or TVAL?
Over the past year FBCV returned +24.20% vs +27.42% for TVAL, so TVAL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBCV or TVAL?
TVAL has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 11.0% for FBCV. Worst drawdown: FBCV -14.3% vs TVAL -15.8%.
Should I hold both FBCV and TVAL?
FBCV and TVAL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCV and TVAL?
55.1% of FBCV's money is in holdings TVAL also owns. 51.4% of TVAL's is in holdings FBCV also owns. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FBCV and 148 in TVAL.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCV or TVAL?
FBCV yields 1.25% while TVAL yields 0.97%, so FBCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TVAL better than FBCV?
TVAL has a lower expense ratio. TVAL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. TVAL is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.