FBL vs MSOX

FBL vs MSOX

Which is better, FBL or MSOX?

FBL has been ahead.

MSOX has a lower expense ratio. FBL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: MSOXHigher Returns: FBL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFBLMSOX
Expense Ratio1.09%0.97%Best
AUM$191M$44M
Dividend Yield2.12%0.00%
Holdings415
YTD Return+3.39%Best-57.95%
1Y Return-17.03%Best-77.48%
3Y Return (annualized)+34.23%Best-71.96%
Volatility (annualized)67.9%Best160.7%
Max Drawdown-63.2%-
$10,000 over 3.8 years$91,553Best$90
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesAdvisorShares Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityTrading-Leveraged Equity
InceptionDec 13, 2022Aug 23, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.8 years).

FBL vs MSOX growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FBL against instead:FBL vs SPYFBL vs QQQFBL vs VOOFBL vs VTIMSOX against:MSOX vs VXUS

FBL vs MSOX Performance

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF (MSOX) is an ETF from AdvisorShares Trust. Over the past year FBL returned -17.03% while MSOX returned -77.48%. Year to date, FBL is up 3.39% versus a loss of 57.95% for MSOX.

Over three years, FBL compounded at +34.23% per year against -71.96% for MSOX. Across the full 4-year window we track, FBL has the edge at +79.09% annualized vs -71.02%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MSOX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 160.7% compared with 67.9% for FBL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.15. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FBL charges 1.09% per year while MSOX charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $97 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBL currently yields 2.12% against 0.00% for MSOX.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FBL and MSOX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FBLMSOX

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FBL or MSOX?

FBL has an expense ratio of 1.09% while MSOX charges 0.97%. MSOX is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FBL or MSOX?

Over the past year FBL returned -17.03% vs -77.48% for MSOX, so FBL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FBL annualized +79.09% vs -71.02% for MSOX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FBL or MSOX?

MSOX has been the more volatile fund at 160.7% annualized versus 67.9% for FBL.

Should I hold both FBL and MSOX?

FBL and MSOX have a monthly-return correlation of -0.15, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FBL or MSOX?

FBL yields 2.12% while MSOX yields 0.00%, so FBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MSOX better than FBL?

MSOX has a lower expense ratio. FBL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.