FBYY vs VTI
GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FBYY or VTI?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBYY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $323,171.84 | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 60.50% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 12 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -26.16% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -35.69% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 13.1%Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FBYY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FBYY vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF (FBYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBYY returned -35.69% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, FBYY is down 26.16% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBYY charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBYY currently yields 60.50% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FBYY and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBYY or VTI?
FBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBYY or VTI?
Over the past year FBYY returned -35.69% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBYY or VTI?
FBYY has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI.
Should I hold both FBYY and VTI?
FBYY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBYY or VTI?
FBYY yields 60.50% while VTI yields 1.06%, so FBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FBYY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.