FCLD vs IVV
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FCLD or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FCLD led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCLD | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $147M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 100 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +48.48%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +49.63%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.77%Best | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.55% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.9% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,512 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 5, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 7, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5 years).
FCLD vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
FCLD vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FCLD returned +49.63% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, FCLD is up 48.48% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, FCLD compounded at +31.77% per year against +22.46% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.55% and +13.28% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FCLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.8% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.9% for FCLD and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCLD charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCLD currently yields 0.01% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
52.5% of FCLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 11.8% of IVV's money is in holdings FCLD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FCLD and 506 in IVV, against full books of 100 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 485 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FCLD (87.6% of the fund), and 30 for FCLD that do not appear in IVV (42.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FCLD | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.51% | 5.76% | 1.25% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.90% | 3.68% | 1.78% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 4.79% | 0.39% | 4.40% |
| STXSeagate Technolo | 4.48% | 0.32% | 4.16% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 4.43% | 0.25% | 4.18% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 3.96% | 0.29% | 3.67% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 3.87% | 0.14% | 3.73% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc. | 3.79% | 0.22% | 3.57% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 3.71% | 0.25% | 3.46% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.40% | 0.15% | 3.25% |
52.5% of FCLD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCLD or IVV?
FCLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FCLD or IVV?
Over the past year FCLD returned +49.63% vs +17.54% for IVV, so FCLD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FCLD or IVV?
FCLD has been the more volatile fund at 26.8% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FCLD -50.9% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both FCLD and IVV?
FCLD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FCLD and IVV?
52.5% of FCLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 11.8% of IVV's is in holdings FCLD also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FCLD and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCLD or IVV?
FCLD yields 0.01% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FCLD?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FCLD led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.