FCUS vs IVV
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FCUS or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FCUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCUS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $93M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.22% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 74 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +25.12%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +31.27%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.91%Best | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.5% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $23,584Best | $21,210 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.0% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Pinnacle Dynamic Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.8 years).
FCUS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
FCUS vs IVV Performance
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) is an ETF from Pinnacle Dynamic Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FCUS returned +31.27% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, FCUS is up 25.12% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, FCUS compounded at +29.91% per year against +22.46% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, FCUS has the edge at +25.33% annualized vs +21.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FCUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.5% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for FCUS and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCUS charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCUS currently yields 3.22% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
55.8% of FCUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 7.7% of IVV's money is in holdings FCUS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FCUS and 506 in IVV, against full books of 74 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 483 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FCUS (91.8% of the fund), and 14 for FCUS that do not appear in IVV (44.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FCUS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.74% | 1.87% | 1.87% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 4.55% | 0.25% | 4.30% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 4.54% | 0.13% | 4.41% |
| VLOValero Energy | 4.05% | 0.18% | 3.87% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 3.92% | 0.18% | 3.74% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.46% | 1.52% | 0.94% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 3.05% | 0.90% | 2.15% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.36% | 0.41% | 2.95% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 3.17% | 0.39% | 2.78% |
| STXSeagate Technolo | 3.16% | 0.32% | 2.84% |
55.8% of FCUS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCUS or IVV?
FCUS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FCUS or IVV?
Over the past year FCUS returned +31.27% vs +17.54% for IVV, so FCUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FCUS annualized +25.33% vs +21.88% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FCUS or IVV?
FCUS has been the more volatile fund at 29.5% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FCUS -39.9% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FCUS and IVV?
FCUS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FCUS and IVV?
55.8% of FCUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 7.7% of IVV's is in holdings FCUS also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FCUS and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCUS or IVV?
FCUS yields 3.22% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FCUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FCUS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FCUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.