FDAT vs VTI
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FDAT or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDAT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $36M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.94% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +2.79% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.00% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.28% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.6%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $13,015 | $19,313Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | Tactical Advantage | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 11, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.5 years).
FDAT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
FDAT vs VTI Performance
Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is an ETF from Tactical Advantage and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDAT returned +2.00% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, FDAT is up 2.79% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, FDAT compounded at +9.28% per year against +21.97% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +20.69% annualized vs +7.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 8.6% for FDAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.2% for FDAT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDAT charges 1.16% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $3 annually, a gap of $113 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDAT currently yields 5.94% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 8 holdings in FDAT and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 100.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in FDAT and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 9 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,156 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FDAT (97.6% of the fund), and 8 for FDAT that do not appear in VTI (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FDAT and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDAT or VTI?
FDAT has an expense ratio of 1.16% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $113 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDAT or VTI?
Over the past year FDAT returned +2.00% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FDAT annualized +7.82% vs +20.69% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDAT or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 8.6% for FDAT. Worst drawdown: FDAT -8.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both FDAT and VTI?
FDAT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDAT or VTI?
FDAT yields 5.94% while VTI yields 1.06%, so FDAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FDAT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.