FDEC vs JANM

FDEC vs JANM

Which is better, FDEC or JANM?

FDEC has been ahead.

FDEC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: FDEC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFDECJANM
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$1.3B$37M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1010
YTD Return+10.08%Best+4.46%
1Y Return+14.78%Best+6.35%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.28%-
5Y Return (annualized)+10.68%-
Volatility (annualized)8.0%2.5%Best
Max Drawdown-13.0%-2.8%Best
$10,000 over 1.7 years$12,341Best$11,032
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionDec 18, 2020Jan 17, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 21, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).

FDEC vs JANM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.

Compare FDEC against instead:FDEC vs SPYFDEC vs QQQFDEC vs VOOFDEC vs VTIJANM against:JANM vs VXUS

FDEC vs JANM Performance

FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FDEC returned +14.78% while JANM returned +6.35%. Year to date, FDEC is up 10.08% versus a gain of 4.46% for JANM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FDEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.0% compared with 2.5% for JANM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.0% for FDEC and -2.8% for JANM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FDEC charges 0.85% per year while JANM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, FDEC currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for JANM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FDEC and JANM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FDECJANM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FDEC or JANM?

FDEC has an expense ratio of 0.85% while JANM charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, FDEC or JANM?

Over the past year FDEC returned +14.78% vs +6.35% for JANM, so FDEC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FDEC annualized +13.17% vs +5.95% for JANM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FDEC or JANM?

FDEC has been the more volatile fund at 8.0% annualized versus 2.5% for JANM. Worst drawdown: FDEC -13.0% vs JANM -2.8%.

Should I hold both FDEC and JANM?

FDEC and JANM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FDEC or JANM?

FDEC yields 0.00% while JANM yields 0.00%, so JANM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JANM better than FDEC?

FDEC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.