FDEC vs TSLZ

FDEC vs TSLZ

Which is better, FDEC or TSLZ?

FDEC has been ahead.

FDEC has a lower expense ratio. FDEC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: FDECHigher Returns: FDEC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFDECTSLZ
Expense Ratio0.85%Best1.05%
AUM$1.3B$25M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.66%
Holdings107
YTD Return+10.30%Best-6.97%
1Y Return+14.76%Best-18.88%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.34%Best-74.74%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.70%-
Volatility (annualized)8.0%Best103.5%
Max Drawdown-13.0%-
$10,000 over 3 years$16,094Best$161
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)REX Shares
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionDec 18, 2020Oct 19, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 19, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (3 years).

FDEC vs TSLZ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.

Compare FDEC against instead:FDEC vs SPYFDEC vs QQQFDEC vs VOOFDEC vs VTITSLZ against:TSLZ vs VXUS

FDEC vs TSLZ Performance

FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year FDEC returned +14.76% while TSLZ returned -18.88%. Year to date, FDEC is up 10.30% versus a loss of 6.97% for TSLZ.

Over three years, FDEC compounded at +16.34% per year against -74.74% for TSLZ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TSLZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 103.5% compared with 8.0% for FDEC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.27. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FDEC charges 0.85% per year while TSLZ charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $105 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDEC currently yields 0.00% against 0.66% for TSLZ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FDEC and TSLZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FDECTSLZ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FDEC or TSLZ?

FDEC has an expense ratio of 0.85% while TSLZ charges 1.05%. FDEC is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FDEC or TSLZ?

Over the past year FDEC returned +14.76% vs -18.88% for TSLZ, so FDEC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FDEC or TSLZ?

TSLZ has been the more volatile fund at 103.5% annualized versus 8.0% for FDEC.

Should I hold both FDEC and TSLZ?

FDEC and TSLZ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FDEC or TSLZ?

FDEC yields 0.00% while TSLZ yields 0.66%, so TSLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TSLZ better than FDEC?

FDEC has a lower expense ratio. FDEC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.