FDIF vs MOO
Fidelity Disruptors ETF vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Which is better, FDIF or MOO?
Each has led over a different period.
FDIF has a lower expense ratio. FDIF led over 3Y and the full window, MOO over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIF | MOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.56% |
| AUM | $110M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 2.20% |
| Holdings | 10 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +14.35%Best | +11.54% |
| 1Y Return | +15.79% | +16.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.73%Best | +4.13% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6%Best | -29.2% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $16,590Best | $10,634 |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 56.9% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | Aug 31, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
FDIF vs MOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
FDIF vs MOO Performance
Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year FDIF returned +15.79% while MOO returned +16.95%. Year to date, FDIF is up 14.35% versus a gain of 11.54% for MOO.
Over three years, FDIF compounded at +21.73% per year against +4.13% for MOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 16.1% for MOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for FDIF and -29.2% for MOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIF charges 0.50% per year while MOO charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $56 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIF currently yields 0.25% against 2.20% for MOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 6 holdings in FDIF and 47 in MOO, totalling 100.0% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in FDIF and 47 in MOO, against full books of 10 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for MOO that do not appear in our book for FDIF (54.2% of the fund), and 6 for FDIF that do not appear in MOO (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FDIF and MOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIF or MOO?
FDIF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while MOO charges 0.56%. FDIF is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDIF or MOO?
Over the past year FDIF returned +15.79% vs +16.95% for MOO, so MOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDIF or MOO?
FDIF has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 16.1% for MOO. Worst drawdown: FDIF -22.6% vs MOO -29.2%.
Should I hold both FDIF and MOO?
FDIF and MOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIF or MOO?
FDIF yields 0.25% while MOO yields 2.20%, so MOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MOO better than FDIF?
FDIF has a lower expense ratio. FDIF led over 3Y and the full window, MOO over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.