FDIF vs NBXG
Fidelity Disruptors ETF vs Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc
Which is better, FDIF or NBXG?
Each has led over a different period.
FDIF has a lower expense ratio. FDIF led over 1Y, NBXG over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIF | NBXG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 1.30% |
| AUM | $110M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 7.97% |
| Holdings | 10 | 137 |
| YTD Return | +14.35%Best | +12.45% |
| 1Y Return | +15.79%Best | +12.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.73% | +25.76%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.32% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8%Best | 19.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6% | -22.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $16,590 | $19,721Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | May 25, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
FDIF vs NBXG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
FDIF vs NBXG Performance
Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc (NBXG) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Over the past year FDIF returned +15.79% while NBXG returned +12.72%. Year to date, FDIF is up 14.35% versus a gain of 12.45% for NBXG.
Over three years, FDIF compounded at +21.73% per year against +25.76% for NBXG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 16.8% for FDIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for FDIF and -22.1% for NBXG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIF charges 0.50% per year while NBXG charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $130 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIF currently yields 0.25% against 7.97% for NBXG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 6 holdings in FDIF and 54 in NBXG, totalling 100.0% and 85.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, FDIF as of Oct 2, 2026 and NBXG as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in FDIF and 54 in NBXG, against full books of 10 and 137.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FDIF and NBXG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIF or NBXG?
FDIF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while NBXG charges 1.30%. FDIF is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDIF or NBXG?
Over the past year FDIF returned +15.79% vs +12.72% for NBXG, so FDIF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDIF or NBXG?
NBXG has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 16.8% for FDIF. Worst drawdown: FDIF -22.6% vs NBXG -22.1%.
Should I hold both FDIF and NBXG?
FDIF and NBXG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIF or NBXG?
FDIF yields 0.25% while NBXG yields 7.97%, so NBXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBXG better than FDIF?
FDIF has a lower expense ratio. FDIF led over 1Y, NBXG over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.