FDIG vs IVV
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FDIG or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FDIG led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y and the full window. FDIG is less concentrated, with 35.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $253M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 116 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -8.24% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | -35.09% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.66%Best | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 60.3% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.3% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $16,157 | $18,756Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.6%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 21, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.5 years).
FDIG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
FDIG vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FDIG returned -35.09% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, FDIG is down 8.24% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, FDIG compounded at +34.66% per year against +22.46% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.3% compared with 15.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.3% for FDIG and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIG charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIG currently yields 1.49% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
20.7% of FDIG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.0% of IVV's money is in holdings FDIG also owns.
FDIG and IVV share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in FDIG and 506 in IVV, against full books of 116 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FDIG (97.5% of the fund), and 29 for FDIG that do not appear in IVV (54.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDIG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| COINCoinbase Global Inc -Class A | 5.32% | 0.06% | 5.26% |
| SQBlock Inc | 3.37% | 0.06% | 3.31% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 2.63% | 0.13% | 2.50% |
| VVisa Inc. Cl A | 1.79% | 0.93% | 0.86% |
| MAMastercard Inc. Cl A | 1.83% | 0.67% | 1.16% |
| GPNGlobal Payments Inc | 2.02% | 0.03% | 1.99% |
| PYPLPaypal Holdings Inc | 1.95% | 0.07% | 1.88% |
| CPAYCorpay Inc | 1.77% | 0.04% | 1.73% |
20.7% of FDIG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIG or IVV?
FDIG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDIG or IVV?
Over the past year FDIG returned -35.09% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDIG or IVV?
FDIG has been the more volatile fund at 60.3% annualized versus 15.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FDIG -58.3% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FDIG and IVV?
FDIG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIG and IVV?
20.7% of FDIG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.0% of IVV's is in holdings FDIG also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in FDIG and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIG or IVV?
FDIG yields 1.49% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FDIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FDIG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FDIG led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y and the full window. FDIG is less concentrated, with 35.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.