FDIV vs LSVD
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF vs LSV Disciplined Value ETF
Which is better, FDIV or LSVD?
LSVD has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIV | LSVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $53M | $678M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.61% | 0.27% |
| Holdings | 224 | 136 |
| YTD Return | -0.05% | +20.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.12% | +30.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.26% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1%Best | 13.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $10,325 | $14,810Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0%Best | 35.0% |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | LSV Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2023 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
FDIV vs LSVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FDIV vs LSVD Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management. Over the past year FDIV returned +2.12% while LSVD returned +30.07%. Year to date, FDIV is down 0.05% versus a gain of 20.92% for LSVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 12.1% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for FDIV and -19.3% for LSVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIV charges 0.35% per year while LSVD charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $40 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIV currently yields 2.61% against 0.27% for LSVD.
Holdings Overlap
32.7% of FDIV's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 19.0% of LSVD's money is in holdings FDIV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 135 in LSVD, against full books of 224 and 136.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 118 positions for LSVD that do not appear in our book for FDIV (80.6% of the fund), and 91 for FDIV that do not appear in LSVD (65.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDIV | Weight in LSVD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corporation | 4.05% | 6.81% | 2.76% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A | 3.77% | 2.80% | 0.97% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc Com | 3.48% | 1.90% | 1.58% |
| LRCXLam Research Corporation | 3.32% | 0.93% | 2.39% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.17% | 1.07% | 2.10% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 3.16% | 0.50% | 2.66% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 2.75% | 0.66% | 2.09% |
| VVisa Inc. Cl A | 2.94% | 0.40% | 2.54% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.04% | 1.05% | 0.01% |
| TAt+T Inc | 1.54% | 0.44% | 1.10% |
32.7% of FDIV is already inside LSVD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIV or LSVD?
FDIV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while LSVD charges 0.40%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDIV or LSVD?
Over the past year FDIV returned +2.12% vs +30.07% for LSVD, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FDIV annualized +1.79% vs +24.38% for LSVD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDIV or LSVD?
LSVD has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 12.1% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: FDIV -15.1% vs LSVD -19.3%.
Should I hold both FDIV and LSVD?
FDIV and LSVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIV and LSVD?
32.7% of FDIV's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 19.0% of LSVD's is in holdings FDIV also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 135 in LSVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIV or LSVD?
FDIV yields 2.61% while LSVD yields 0.27%, so FDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSVD better than FDIV?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.