FDIV vs WBIF
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Which is better, FDIV or WBIF?
WBIF has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. WBIF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIV | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $53M | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.61% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 224 | 152 |
| YTD Return | -0.05% | +14.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.12% | +15.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.26% | +10.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 13.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6% | -17.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $11,722 | $13,305Best |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2023 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
FDIV vs WBIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
FDIV vs WBIF Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year FDIV returned +2.12% while WBIF returned +15.37%. Year to date, FDIV is down 0.05% versus a gain of 14.87% for WBIF.
Over three years, FDIV compounded at +6.26% per year against +10.35% for WBIF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WBIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 12.8% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for FDIV and -17.2% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIV charges 0.35% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $165 annually, a gap of $130 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIV currently yields 2.61% against 0.00% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 15.6% of FDIV's money is in holdings WBIF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for WBIF, our book for it covers 83.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
FDIV and WBIF share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 62 in WBIF, against full books of 224 and 152.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDIV | Weight in WBIF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 3.16% | 1.51% | 1.65% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 2.98% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
| VVisa Inc-class A Shares | 2.94% | 1.46% | 1.48% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.88% | 1.44% | 1.44% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 0.67% | 2.47% | 1.80% |
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 0.37% | 2.18% | 1.81% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 1.21% | 1.26% | 0.05% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp. | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
| RMDResmed Inc. | 0.31% | 1.11% | 0.80% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FDIV and WBIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIV or WBIF?
FDIV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while WBIF charges 1.65%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $130 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDIV or WBIF?
Over the past year FDIV returned +2.12% vs +15.37% for WBIF, so WBIF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDIV or WBIF?
WBIF has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 12.8% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: FDIV -18.6% vs WBIF -17.2%.
Should I hold both FDIV and WBIF?
FDIV and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIV and WBIF?
At least 15.6% of FDIV's money is in holdings WBIF also owns. Our book for WBIF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 62 in WBIF.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIV or WBIF?
FDIV yields 2.61% while WBIF yields 0.00%, so FDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIF better than FDIV?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. WBIF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.