FDIV vs WBIG
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF vs WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
Which is better, FDIV or WBIG?
WBIG has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. WBIG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIV | WBIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 1.59% |
| AUM | $53M | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.61% | 1.17% |
| Holdings | 224 | 159 |
| YTD Return | -0.05% | +12.49%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.12% | +11.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.26% | +7.85%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +1.53% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6%Best | -20.2% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $11,722 | $12,309Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0% | 23.9%Best |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2023 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
FDIV vs WBIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
FDIV vs WBIG Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year FDIV returned +2.12% while WBIG returned +11.17%. Year to date, FDIV is down 0.05% versus a gain of 12.49% for WBIG.
Over three years, FDIV compounded at +6.26% per year against +7.85% for WBIG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.1% for WBIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for FDIV and -20.2% for WBIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIV charges 0.35% per year while WBIG charges 1.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $159 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIV currently yields 2.61% against 1.17% for WBIG.
Holdings Overlap
19.9% of FDIV's money is in holdings WBIG also owns. 20.5% of WBIG's money is in holdings FDIV also owns.
WBIG and FDIV share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 71 in WBIG, against full books of 224 and 159.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 53 positions for WBIG that do not appear in our book for FDIV (72.2% of the fund), and 92 for FDIV that do not appear in WBIG (78.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDIV | Weight in WBIG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 3.16% | 1.22% | 1.94% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.94% | 1.19% | 1.75% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.88% | 1.18% | 1.70% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.98% | 1.04% | 1.94% |
| TAT&T Inc. | 1.54% | 2.09% | 0.55% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 0.67% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.38% | 1.23% | 0.15% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 1.21% | 1.17% | 0.04% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.04% | 1.28% | 0.24% |
| VLOValero Energy | 1.04% | 1.28% | 0.24% |
20.5% of WBIG is already inside FDIV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIV or WBIG?
FDIV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while WBIG charges 1.59%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $124 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDIV or WBIG?
Over the past year FDIV returned +2.12% vs +11.17% for WBIG, so WBIG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDIV or WBIG?
FDIV has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.1% for WBIG. Worst drawdown: FDIV -18.6% vs WBIG -20.2%.
Should I hold both FDIV and WBIG?
FDIV and WBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIV and WBIG?
20.5% of WBIG's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 20.5% of WBIG's is in holdings FDIV also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 71 in WBIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIV or WBIG?
FDIV yields 2.61% while WBIG yields 1.17%, so FDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIG better than FDIV?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. WBIG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. WBIG is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.