FDIV vs ZAP
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, FDIV or ZAP?
ZAP has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. ZAP led over 1Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIV | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $53M | $440M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.61% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 224 | 94 |
| YTD Return | -0.05% | +6.45%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.12% | +2.72%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.26% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1% | -13.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $10,325 | $13,487Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0%Best | 44.2% |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2023 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
FDIV vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FDIV vs ZAP Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year FDIV returned +2.12% while ZAP returned +2.72%. Year to date, FDIV is down 0.05% versus a gain of 6.45% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 12.1% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for FDIV and -13.0% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIV charges 0.35% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $50 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIV currently yields 2.61% against 1.74% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
4.9% of FDIV's money is in holdings ZAP also owns. 39.0% of ZAP's money is in holdings FDIV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 224 and 94.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 32 positions for ZAP that do not appear in our book for FDIV (59.8% of the fund), and 94 for FDIV that do not appear in ZAP (93.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDIV | Weight in ZAP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMEAmetek Inc | 0.53% | 4.66% | 4.13% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 1.44% | 3.65% | 2.21% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 0.47% | 4.28% | 3.81% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 0.58% | 3.91% | 3.33% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 0.40% | 3.85% | 3.45% |
| PEGPub Serv Enterp | 0.31% | 3.65% | 3.34% |
| AEEAmeren Corporation Utilities | 0.25% | 3.06% | 2.81% |
| FEFirstenergy Corp | 0.21% | 2.83% | 2.62% |
| HUBBHubbell Inc | 0.21% | 2.77% | 2.56% |
| EIXEdison Intl | 0.17% | 2.44% | 2.27% |
39.0% of ZAP is already inside FDIV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIV or ZAP?
FDIV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while ZAP charges 0.50%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDIV or ZAP?
Over the past year FDIV returned +2.12% vs +2.72% for ZAP, so ZAP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FDIV annualized +1.79% vs +18.08% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDIV or ZAP?
ZAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 12.1% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: FDIV -15.1% vs ZAP -13.0%.
Should I hold both FDIV and ZAP?
FDIV and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIV and ZAP?
39.0% of ZAP's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 39.0% of ZAP's is in holdings FDIV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 45 in ZAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIV or ZAP?
FDIV yields 2.61% while ZAP yields 1.74%, so FDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than FDIV?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. ZAP led over 1Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.