FDRR vs FNDX
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates vs Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF
Which is better, FDRR or FNDX?
Nearly the same fund. FDRR costs less.
FDRR has a lower expense ratio. FDRR led over 3Y, FNDX over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FNDX is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDRR | FNDX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.25% |
| AUM | $749M | $28.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.05% | 1.50% |
| Holdings | 108 | 736 |
| YTD Return | +14.46% | +19.26%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.24% | +25.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.78%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.09% | +13.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2%Best | 15.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6%Best | -37.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,498 | $19,094Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.3% | 22.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Aug 15, 2013 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 15, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (10.1 years).
FDRR vs FNDX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.1 years both funds cover.
FDRR vs FNDX Performance
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF (FNDX) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FDRR returned +21.24% while FNDX returned +25.57%. Year to date, FDRR is up 14.46% versus a gain of 19.26% for FNDX.
Over three years, FDRR compounded at +22.78% per year against +21.97% for FNDX; over five years the annualized figures are +13.09% and +13.81% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, FNDX has the edge at +13.27% annualized vs +12.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNDX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.2% for FDRR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for FDRR and -37.7% for FNDX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDRR charges 0.15% per year while FNDX charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $25 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDRR currently yields 2.05% against 1.50% for FNDX.
Holdings Overlap
91.5% of FDRR's money is in holdings FNDX also owns. 42.6% of FNDX's money is in holdings FDRR also owns.
Most of FDRR is already inside FNDX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
92 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in FDRR and 733 in FNDX, against full books of 108 and 736.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 621 positions for FNDX that do not appear in our book for FDRR (56.4% of the fund), and 7 for FDRR that do not appear in FNDX (3.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDRR | Weight in FNDX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.18% | 4.82% | 3.36% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corporation | 9.33% | 0.80% | 8.53% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.63% | 3.20% | 3.43% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc Cl A | 5.03% | 1.77% | 3.26% |
| DELLDell Technologies -C | 4.50% | 0.22% | 4.28% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A | 2.35% | 1.84% | 0.51% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.44% | 0.49% | 2.95% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co | 2.01% | 1.57% | 0.44% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp | 1.19% | 2.37% | 1.18% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.36% | 1.35% | 0.01% |
91.5% of FDRR is already inside FNDX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDRR or FNDX?
FDRR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FNDX charges 0.25%. FDRR is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDRR or FNDX?
Over the past year FDRR returned +21.24% vs +25.57% for FNDX, so FNDX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FDRR annualized +12.14% vs +13.27% for FNDX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDRR or FNDX?
FNDX has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.2% for FDRR. Worst drawdown: FDRR -37.6% vs FNDX -37.7%.
Should I hold both FDRR and FNDX?
FDRR and FNDX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDRR and FNDX?
91.5% of FDRR's money is in holdings FNDX also owns. 42.6% of FNDX's is in holdings FDRR also owns. They hold 92 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in FDRR and 733 in FNDX.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDRR or FNDX?
FDRR yields 2.05% while FNDX yields 1.50%, so FDRR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FNDX better than FDRR?
FDRR has a lower expense ratio. FDRR led over 3Y, FNDX over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. FNDX is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.