FDRR vs LVDS
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates vs JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
Which is better, FDRR or LVDS?
LVDS has been ahead.
FDRR has a lower expense ratio. LVDS led over 1Y and the full window. LVDS is less concentrated, with 30.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDRR | LVDS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $749M | $114M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.05% | 7.56% |
| Holdings | 108 | 133 |
| YTD Return | +14.46% | +20.52%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.24% | +25.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.78% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.09% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9% | 10.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.5% | -6.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $12,994 | $13,088Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.3% | 30.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Jul 11, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
FDRR vs LVDS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
FDRR vs LVDS Performance
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year FDRR returned +21.24% while LVDS returned +25.95%. Year to date, FDRR is up 14.46% versus a gain of 20.52% for LVDS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDRR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.9% compared with 10.6% for LVDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.5% for FDRR and -6.6% for LVDS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDRR charges 0.15% per year while LVDS charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $30 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDRR currently yields 2.05% against 7.56% for LVDS.
Holdings Overlap
40.7% of FDRR's money is in holdings LVDS also owns. 39.3% of LVDS's money is in holdings FDRR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
34 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in FDRR and 131 in LVDS, against full books of 108 and 133.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 95 positions for LVDS that do not appear in our book for FDRR (59.8% of the fund), and 65 for FDRR that do not appear in LVDS (54.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDRR | Weight in LVDS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.18% | 5.39% | 2.79% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.63% | 5.92% | 0.71% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp | 1.19% | 2.46% | 1.27% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A | 2.35% | 1.29% | 1.06% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc | 1.45% | 1.93% | 0.48% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.58% | 1.45% | 0.13% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.36% | 1.13% | 0.23% |
| PMPhilip Morris International | 0.83% | 1.66% | 0.83% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 0.95% | 1.52% | 0.57% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.90% | 0.28% | 1.62% |
40.7% of FDRR is already inside LVDS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDRR or LVDS?
FDRR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while LVDS charges 0.30%. FDRR is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDRR or LVDS?
Over the past year FDRR returned +21.24% vs +25.95% for LVDS, so LVDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FDRR annualized +22.32% vs +23.00% for LVDS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDRR or LVDS?
FDRR has been the more volatile fund at 10.9% annualized versus 10.6% for LVDS. Worst drawdown: FDRR -8.5% vs LVDS -6.6%.
Should I hold both FDRR and LVDS?
FDRR and LVDS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDRR and LVDS?
40.7% of FDRR's money is in holdings LVDS also owns. 39.3% of LVDS's is in holdings FDRR also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in FDRR and 131 in LVDS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDRR or LVDS?
FDRR yields 2.05% while LVDS yields 7.56%, so LVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LVDS better than FDRR?
FDRR has a lower expense ratio. LVDS led over 1Y and the full window. LVDS is less concentrated, with 30.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.