FDV vs IDE
Federated Hermes US Strategic Dividend ETF vs Voya Infrastructure Industrials and Materials Fund
Which is better, FDV or IDE?
Each has led over a different period.
FDV has a lower expense ratio. FDV led over 1Y, IDE over 3Y and the full window. IDE is less concentrated, with 14.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDV | IDE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 1.22% |
| AUM | $934M | $199M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.04% | 9.12% |
| Holdings | 103 | 281 |
| YTD Return | +16.79%Best | +5.53% |
| 1Y Return | +18.07%Best | +10.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.24% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 17.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -18.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $14,813 | $19,190Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.4% | 14.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes Funds | Voya Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2022 | Jan 26, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).
FDV vs IDE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
FDV vs IDE Performance
Federated Hermes US Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) is an ETF from Federated Hermes Funds and Voya Infrastructure Industrials and Materials Fund (IDE) is an ETF from Voya Investment Management. Over the past year FDV returned +18.07% while IDE returned +10.97%. Year to date, FDV is up 16.79% versus a gain of 5.53% for IDE.
Over three years, FDV compounded at +17.24% per year against +21.37% for IDE. Across the full 4-year window we track, IDE has the edge at +18.19% annualized vs +10.60%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 12.5% for FDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for FDV and -18.3% for IDE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDV charges 0.50% per year while IDE charges 1.22%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $122 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDV currently yields 3.04% against 9.12% for IDE.
Holdings Overlap
10.6% of FDV's money is in holdings IDE also owns. 3.0% of IDE's money is in holdings FDV also owns.
FDV and IDE share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, FDV as of Oct 2, 2026 and IDE as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
6 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in FDV and 274 in IDE, against full books of 103 and 281.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 91 positions for IDE that do not appear in our book for FDV (46.0% of the fund), and 46 for FDV that do not appear in IDE (86.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FDV and IDE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDV or IDE?
FDV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IDE charges 1.22%. FDV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDV or IDE?
Over the past year FDV returned +18.07% vs +10.97% for IDE, so FDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FDV annualized +10.60% vs +18.19% for IDE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDV or IDE?
IDE has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 12.5% for FDV. Worst drawdown: FDV -16.7% vs IDE -18.3%.
Should I hold both FDV and IDE?
FDV and IDE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDV and IDE?
10.6% of FDV's money is in holdings IDE also owns. 3.0% of IDE's is in holdings FDV also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in FDV and 274 in IDE.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDV or IDE?
FDV yields 3.04% while IDE yields 9.12%, so IDE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IDE better than FDV?
FDV has a lower expense ratio. FDV led over 1Y, IDE over 3Y and the full window. IDE is less concentrated, with 14.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.