FDWM vs FLQL
Fidelity Womens Leadership ETF vs Franklin US Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Which is better, FDWM or FLQL?
Each has led over a different period.
FLQL has a lower expense ratio. FDWM led over 1Y, FLQL over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. FDWM is less concentrated, with 36.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDWM | FLQL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.15%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 82 | 219 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -21.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $13,877 | $17,363Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.7%Best | 37.2% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2021 | Apr 26, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 335 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. FDWM has data through Nov 13, 2025 and FLQL through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 17, 2021 to Nov 13, 2025 (4.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDWM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.5% for FLQL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for FDWM and -21.4% for FLQL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDWM charges 0.59% per year while FLQL charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $15 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDWM currently yields 0.52% against 1.06% for FLQL.
Holdings Overlap
43.8% of FDWM's money is in holdings FLQL also owns. 37.3% of FLQL's money is in holdings FDWM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 428 days apart, FDWM as of Jul 31, 2025 and FLQL as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
19 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in FDWM and 217 in FLQL, against full books of 82 and 219.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 193 positions for FLQL that do not appear in our book for FDWM (62.0% of the fund), and 64 for FDWM that do not appear in FLQL (53.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDWM | Weight in FLQL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corporation | 7.02% | 7.46% | 0.44% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.91% | 7.72% | 1.81% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.10% | 5.26% | 1.84% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.73% | 3.23% | 1.50% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc Cl C | 3.70% | 2.65% | 1.05% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co | 2.12% | 1.11% | 1.01% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.69% | 1.30% | 0.39% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc . | 1.26% | 1.44% | 0.18% |
| MAMastercard Inc. Cl A | 1.32% | 1.21% | 0.11% |
| ANETArista Networks Inccommon Stock | 1.18% | 1.25% | 0.07% |
43.8% of FDWM is already inside FLQL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDWM or FLQL?
FDWM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while FLQL charges 0.15%. FLQL is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, FDWM or FLQL?
FDWM has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.5% for FLQL. Worst drawdown: FDWM -29.1% vs FLQL -21.4%.
Should I hold both FDWM and FLQL?
FDWM and FLQL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDWM and FLQL?
43.8% of FDWM's money is in holdings FLQL also owns. 37.3% of FLQL's is in holdings FDWM also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in FDWM and 217 in FLQL.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDWM or FLQL?
FDWM yields 0.52% while FLQL yields 1.06%, so FLQL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLQL better than FDWM?
FLQL has a lower expense ratio. FDWM led over 1Y, FLQL over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. FDWM is less concentrated, with 36.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.