FEBP vs JULP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - February vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July
Which is better, FEBP or JULP?
FEBP has been ahead.
FEBP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEBP | JULP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $30M | $39M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 16 | 16 |
| YTD Return | +10.15%Best | +8.57% |
| 1Y Return | +13.96%Best | +11.67% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3%Best | 6.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1%Best | -12.4% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,420Best | $13,343 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2024 | May 8, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 8, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
FEBP vs JULP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
FEBP vs JULP Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July (JULP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year FEBP returned +13.96% while JULP returned +11.67%. Year to date, FEBP is up 10.15% versus a gain of 8.57% for JULP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JULP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.7% compared with 6.3% for FEBP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for FEBP and -12.4% for JULP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEBP charges 0.50% per year while JULP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, FEBP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for JULP.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FEBP and JULP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEBP or JULP?
FEBP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while JULP charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FEBP or JULP?
Over the past year FEBP returned +13.96% vs +11.67% for JULP, so FEBP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEBP annualized +13.04% vs +12.77% for JULP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FEBP or JULP?
JULP has been the more volatile fund at 6.7% annualized versus 6.3% for FEBP. Worst drawdown: FEBP -12.1% vs JULP -12.4%.
Should I hold both FEBP and JULP?
FEBP and JULP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEBP or JULP?
FEBP yields 0.00% while JULP yields 0.00%, so JULP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JULP better than FEBP?
FEBP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.