FEBP vs OCTP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - February vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October
Which is better, FEBP or OCTP?
OCTP has been ahead.
OCTP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEBP | OCTP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $30M | $41M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 16 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +10.15% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.96% | +14.12%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3%Best | 6.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,292 | $13,449Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2024 | May 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 17, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
FEBP vs OCTP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
FEBP vs OCTP Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October (OCTP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year FEBP returned +13.96% while OCTP returned +14.12%. Year to date, FEBP is up 10.15% versus a gain of 11.06% for OCTP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OCTP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.6% compared with 6.3% for FEBP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for FEBP and -12.0% for OCTP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEBP charges 0.50% per year while OCTP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, FEBP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for OCTP.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FEBP and OCTP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEBP or OCTP?
FEBP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while OCTP charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, FEBP or OCTP?
Over the past year FEBP returned +13.96% vs +14.12% for OCTP, so OCTP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEBP annualized +12.59% vs +13.14% for OCTP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FEBP or OCTP?
OCTP has been the more volatile fund at 6.6% annualized versus 6.3% for FEBP. Worst drawdown: FEBP -12.1% vs OCTP -12.0%.
Should I hold both FEBP and OCTP?
FEBP and OCTP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEBP or OCTP?
FEBP yields 0.00% while OCTP yields 0.00%, so OCTP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OCTP better than FEBP?
OCTP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.