FEBU vs MAYP
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May
Which is better, FEBU or MAYP?
FEBU has been ahead.
MAYP has a lower expense ratio. FEBU led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEBU | MAYP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $53M | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 12 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +8.95%Best | +7.96% |
| 1Y Return | +11.31%Best | +10.69% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.6% | 4.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.7% | -11.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,040Best | $11,850 |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2025 | May 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
FEBU vs MAYP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
FEBU vs MAYP Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU) is an ETF from AllianzIM and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May (MAYP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year FEBU returned +11.31% while MAYP returned +10.69%. Year to date, FEBU is up 8.95% versus a gain of 7.96% for MAYP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEBU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.6% compared with 4.6% for MAYP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.7% for FEBU and -11.1% for MAYP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEBU charges 0.74% per year while MAYP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $50 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEBU currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for MAYP.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FEBU and MAYP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEBU or MAYP?
FEBU has an expense ratio of 0.74% while MAYP charges 0.50%. MAYP is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FEBU or MAYP?
Over the past year FEBU returned +11.31% vs +10.69% for MAYP, so FEBU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEBU annualized +11.54% vs +10.50% for MAYP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FEBU or MAYP?
FEBU has been the more volatile fund at 8.6% annualized versus 4.6% for MAYP. Worst drawdown: FEBU -11.7% vs MAYP -11.1%.
Should I hold both FEBU and MAYP?
FEBU and MAYP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEBU or MAYP?
FEBU yields 0.00% while MAYP yields 0.00%, so MAYP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAYP better than FEBU?
MAYP has a lower expense ratio. FEBU led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.