FEDM vs RINT
Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core ETF vs Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF
Which is better, FEDM or RINT?
Nearly the same fund. FEDM costs less.
FEDM has a lower expense ratio. RINT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. RINT is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 15.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEDM | RINT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $82M | $156M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 0.81% |
| Holdings | 265 | 364 |
| YTD Return | +8.67%Best | +7.35% |
| 1Y Return | +14.21% | +14.43%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.03% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.65% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4%Best | 12.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.9%Tie | -11.9%Tie |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $12,479 | $12,593Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.9% | 12.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2021 | May 13, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
FEDM vs RINT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
FEDM vs RINT Performance
Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core ETF (FEDM) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year FEDM returned +14.21% while RINT returned +14.43%. Year to date, FEDM is up 8.67% versus a gain of 7.35% for RINT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 11.4% for FEDM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.9% for FEDM and -11.9% for RINT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEDM charges 0.12% per year while RINT charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $49 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEDM currently yields 2.89% against 0.81% for RINT.
Holdings Overlap
42.7% of FEDM's money is in holdings RINT also owns. 28.7% of RINT's money is in holdings FEDM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
69 positions in common, counted across the 214 positions we hold weights for in FEDM and 328 in RINT, against full books of 265 and 364.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 4 positions for RINT that do not appear in our book for FEDM (1.7% of the fund), and 0 for FEDM that do not appear in RINT (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FEDM | Weight in RINT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 2.82% | 2.39% | 0.43% |
| SHEL:LNShell plc | 1.59% | 1.18% | 0.41% |
| RY:CARoyal Bank of Canada | 1.85% | 0.81% | 1.04% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag – Class N | 1.41% | 0.69% | 0.72% |
| SIE:SGSiemens N Ag | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.85% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 1.24% | 0.73% | 0.51% |
| HSBA:LNHsbc Holdings Plc | 0.62% | 1.26% | 0.64% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia | 1.21% | 0.61% | 0.60% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 1.03% | 0.59% | 0.44% |
| ISP:MIIntesa Sanpaolo SpA Shs | 1.17% | 0.45% | 0.72% |
42.7% of FEDM is already inside RINT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEDM or RINT?
FEDM has an expense ratio of 0.12% while RINT charges 0.49%. FEDM is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FEDM or RINT?
Over the past year FEDM returned +14.21% vs +14.43% for RINT, so RINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FEDM annualized +17.14% vs +17.90% for RINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FEDM or RINT?
RINT has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 11.4% for FEDM. Worst drawdown: FEDM -11.9% vs RINT -11.9%.
Should I hold both FEDM and RINT?
FEDM and RINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FEDM and RINT?
42.7% of FEDM's money is in holdings RINT also owns. 28.7% of RINT's is in holdings FEDM also owns. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 214 positions we hold weights for in FEDM and 328 in RINT.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEDM or RINT?
FEDM yields 2.89% while RINT yields 0.81%, so FEDM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RINT better than FEDM?
FEDM has a lower expense ratio. RINT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. RINT is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 15.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.